AFINAL, " O CARA " NÃO É O PRIMEIRO ! ! ! . . .
 The 2010 TIME 100
 The 2010 TIME 100
In our annual TIME 100 issue we name the people who most affect our world
If we lived in some kind of Orwellian dystopia, we could hook a nanobot to everybody's brain and scientifically measure just how much influence each human being has on every other. Whom do we trust? Whom do we fear? Whose ideas shape our view of the world — whether or not we even realize it?
Fortunately, that's pure science fiction. But it is becoming easier to quantify certain kinds of influence. Social-networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, for instance, can provide some basic information about the breadth of a person's brand. The measures are far from perfect: they tend to reward the young rather than the old, artists and entertainers rather than scientists and thinkers. Lady Gaga has nearly as many Twitter followers as Barack Obama does; is she really just as influential? Probably not. But in other cases, the comparisons are more apples to apples. On our index, Sarah Palin's social-networking score is about 45 times that of Nancy Pelosi. Conan O'Brien may have lost the Tonight Show wars, but he emerged with almost 20 times as many Twitter followers as Jay Leno (who was one of the TIME 100 in 2009). Pelosi and Leno might hold the more prestigious positions, but there's little doubt about who has more ability to change the course of our conversations at a moment's notice — and in an interconnected world, that's what influence is all about.
Fortunately, that's pure science fiction. But it is becoming easier to quantify certain kinds of influence. Social-networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, for instance, can provide some basic information about the breadth of a person's brand. The measures are far from perfect: they tend to reward the young rather than the old, artists and entertainers rather than scientists and thinkers. Lady Gaga has nearly as many Twitter followers as Barack Obama does; is she really just as influential? Probably not. But in other cases, the comparisons are more apples to apples. On our index, Sarah Palin's social-networking score is about 45 times that of Nancy Pelosi. Conan O'Brien may have lost the Tonight Show wars, but he emerged with almost 20 times as many Twitter followers as Jay Leno (who was one of the TIME 100 in 2009). Pelosi and Leno might hold the more prestigious positions, but there's little doubt about who has more ability to change the course of our conversations at a moment's notice — and in an interconnected world, that's what influence is all about.
Barack Obama - 7,740,557
Lady Gaga - 6,697,752 
Ashton Kutcher - 6,390,600 
Taylor Swift - 5,608,398 
Oprah Winfrey - 2,907,504 
Robert Pattinson - 2,298,274 
Ben Stiller - 1,735,285 
Serena Williams - 1,681,207 
Conan O'Brien - 1,352,195 
Jet Li - 1,220,613 
Damon Lindelof - 977,222
Carlton Cuse - 969,097
Sarah Palin - 884,145 
Glenn Beck - 621,436 
Neil Patrick Harris - 493,561 
Sandra Bullock - 329,229 
Marc Jacobs - 275,689 
Banksy - 259,153 
Sachin Tendulkar - 175,852 
Simon Cowell - 171,726 
Bill Clinton - 160,731 
Lea Michele - 151,916 
Scott Brown - 131,053 
Didier Drogba - 97,611 
Chetan Bhagat - 94,074 
Mir-Hossein Mousavi - 77,455
James Cameron - 50,394 
Kim Yu-Na - 49,493 
Mike Krahulik - 41,305 
Zaha Hadid - 33,242 
Lee Kuan Yew - 27,859 
Ricky Gervais - 27,422 
Mike Mullen - 22,849 
Zahra Rahnavard - 21,747 
Elton John - 19,309 
Nancy Pelosi - 19,123 
Manmohan Singh - 17,977 
Phil Mickelson - 14,922
Michael Pollan - 14,956 
Sonia Sotomayor - 13,399 
Jenny Beth Martin - 13,266 
Annise Parker - 13,093 
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva - 12,371 
Steve Jobs - 10,662 
Temple Grandin - 8,898 
Tim Westergren - 8,152 
Christine Lagarde - 7,913 
Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan - 6,598 
Suzanne Collins - 5,960 
Recep Tayyip Erdogan - 5,925 
Elizabeth Warren - 5,875 
...///...
NOTA : QUEM TIVER DÚVIDAS, PODE CONSULTAR O LINK DA REVISTA TIME
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1984685_1984713_1984669,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1984685_1984713_1984669,00.html
 
 
 
 
 

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário